Jane Eyre

Depending on how you look at it, I am either the worst or the best possible reviewer for a film adaption of Jane Eyre. Consider the facts: It’s my favorite book of all time. I’ve read it over and over again, sometimes in an academic context. I’m irrationally defensive of it, and in fact take it way too personally whenever someone suggests that Jane is a) an unreliable narrator b) a sad sack and/or c) weird. (She’s just misunderstood!) Regardless of whether my opinions actually matter, you can bet that I do have strong opinions about this movie, and that I just might get into a first fight with director Cary Fukunaga over them. You see, while I found Jane Eyre to be a perfectly serviceable adaptation of the greatest book of all time, I just didn’t think it was at any point distinctive or inventive enough to justify its existence. It was very “by the book,” in word, though not in spirit…so much so that I suggest you just buy the book.

The film gets off to a weird start: it opens just as Jane is running away from Thornfield Hall, distraught over the revelation that her intended, Edward Rochester, is already married…and to a “madwoman in the attic” no less! Thus, our first introduction to this so-called strong female character is a view of her curled up in the fetal position, sobbing. We get no dialogue—not even Jane’s famous narrative voice—but only a vision of abject misery. (It’s at this point that a few people in the audience left to sneak into Hop.)

The plot picks up once we get into the flashbacks, which, of course, actually come first in the novel. We see Jane as a young girl being tormented by her brutish cousin, John Reed. He hits her, and she hits back; this is one of the few times in the film when we actually get a glimpse of the “passion” Jane is so often accused of having in excess. After being deemed unmanageable, she is carted off to Lowood School, where we see, in fast forward, the development of her friendship with Helen Burns. Once Helen dies, we watch the remainder of Jane’s time at Lowood (during which she became a teacher) play out in roughly a minute and a half. With little ceremony, Jane leaves to begin her “real” life.

It is clear that the main event is Jane’s experience at Thornfield Hall, and thus this, essentially, glorified exposition serves only as an obligatory preamble. We do not need to know too much about Jane’s childhood and development—just enough to show us that she, like Rochester, is a sensitive soul searching for a human connection. Yet, once at Thornfield, Jane’s life appears little improved. Any excitement one might find in the book is here crushed by Jane’s overly-severe countenance. Indeed, this is one of the major problems I had with the film: Jane Eyre looks miserable all the time. She never shows any pleasure in her new surroundings, or even in bantering with Mr. Rochester. Part of the problem may be that the film dispenses with the narrative voice that makes the character of Jane so distinctive. We are left only to guess at Jane’s inner passion, which is a challenge given Mia Wasikowska’s dour, or at best blank, expression. Still, I think that the major problem lies in Jane’s being reduced to a 19th century Bella Swan.

Although Jane offers some perfunctory explanations of her personal philosophy, the strength of her character is largely overshadowed by the need for major plot developments. The movie presents a reading of the story that is so different from my own: it completely misses out on Jane’s humor and strong sense of self, and instead focuses on the melodrama and “romance.” As a result, she might as well be choosing between a vampire and a werewolf! Still, there’s something weirdly muted and slow-paced about the whole affair, which almost makes one wish for some supernatural excess. Even the already vampiric Bertha Mason, Rochester’s wife, is less sensationalized in the movie than she is in the novel. All of Charlotte Bronte’s charmingly weird flourishes have been expunged, or glossed over to present an unnecessarily staid production.

Thus, the plot of Jane Eyre is just as you remember it in the book…but without any of the details that proved to your high school English teacher that you had actually read it. At times, this means the complete omission of several minor-but-still-important characters—namely, the only people who were ever nice to Jane during her childhood. (Seriously, how are we supposed to believe she turned out reasonably well-adjusted with so little exposure to actual human decency?) At other times, this means skipping over scenes that are too bizarre and/or playful for the tone of the movie, such as when Mr. Rochester arrives at Thornfield disguised as a gypsy. It’s understandable that certain details would not be included in the movie due to time constraints, but this does not always explain why other scenes (such as the overlong opening scene of Jane literally at a crossroads, and then returning to the womb of nature) were included.

All in all, I questioned the choices made by the director, the screenwriter, and even the casting agent. There was nothing wrong with the movie, and it was quite lovely to look at, but it just did not offer the reading I was hoping to see. Additionally, the cast fell short of my expectations. For one, Judi Dench was completely wasted as Mr. Fairfax. (Come on, it’s Judi Dench!) Furthermore, neither Mia Wasikowska nor Michael Fassbender brought anything new or interesting to their roles. Fassbender is far too good-looking, and not nearly commanding enough in appearance, to make sense for Rochester’s character. Wasikowska, usually very pretty, is somehow too plain even for Jane, perhaps because she appears to be forever scowling. I did not dislike either of them, but I was also not convinced by their interpretations.

Still, all this really means is that the film could not live up to the version in my head. And, for that, I cannot fault it too much (or, at least, any more than I already have). It was entertaining enough, and certainly visually-appealing enough, to provide a pleasant evening out. It’s sure to please some fans and disappoint others, but either way, it’s not so bad. It still beats finding out that your fiancé is stashing his homicidal first wife in a room just above where you sleep….

Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: